Clinical toolsOocyte Live Birth Predictor
Session only · no data stored
CLINICAL CALCULATOR

Oocyte Live Birth Predictor

IVF and oocyte cryopreservation

MVP · v0.1
Starting point: Oocyte-based IVF prediction is not yet clinically available.

No clinical probabilities are generated in this research MVP.

01

Consultation parameters

Enter the information available for this consultation.

Required
years

Use age at retrieval, rather than current age.

Optional

AMH · ovarian reserve marker

Optional

Total AFC across both ovaries

Optional
MII

Enter the actual MII count, when known

Inputs remain in this browser tab and are cleared on reload.

Ovarian reserve is not oocyte quality

AMH and AFC inform ovarian response. They do not directly measure oocyte quality or independently determine live-birth probability.

Consultation overview

Transparent estimates start with an applicable model.

Awaiting input
Estimated ovarian response
—No estimate generated

Oocyte yield after stimulation

At least one live birth
—No estimate generated

Estimated cumulative probability

Prediction model not yet available

Add consultation parameters to review model availability and assumptions.

Evidence & methodology

Clinical interpretation

Keep the estimate in context.

01

Response and outcome are different

AMH and AFC help assess expected stimulation response. Live birth also depends on age, sperm, embryo development, laboratory performance and transfer factors.

02

A model is a population estimate

A prediction cannot guarantee an individual outcome. Published cohorts and laboratory methods may differ from your practice.

03

Age belongs to the oocyte

For cryopreserved oocytes, use age when the oocytes were frozen. Do not substitute age at warming or transfer.

Evidence & methodology

Evidence and methodology

Reference literature for model verification. Citation does not mean a model is implemented or clinically validated here.

02

Clinical verification is pending. Original model equations, parameters and reproduction checks have not been independently verified for this application. Clinical prediction models remain unavailable.

01Not implemented

Goldman et al. 2017

Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients

Human Reproduction · 32(4), 853–859
Scope & assumptions

Goldman et al. (2017), autologous-oocyte research implementation: the ≤35 category uses age 35 in the exponent and 95% survival; integer ages 36–44 use 85% survival. Survival is included once in blastocyst probability. The model assumes 60% live birth per euploid blastocyst and independent events. It is derived from surrogate fresh ICSI data with normal ovarian reserve. Complete supplementary-table transcription is under independent review (11 rounding-boundary differences); no external clinical validation is claimed. The donor branch and fresh-IVF predictions are unavailable.

View reference
02Not implemented

Doyle et al. 2016

Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval

Fertility and Sterility · 105(2), 459–466.e2
Scope & assumptions

Retrospective single-centre autologous vitrified/warmed-oocyte experience, including elective and medically indicated preservation. Age groups, laboratory setting and outcome definitions must be checked before reproducing or generalising the model.

View reference
03Clinical guidance

ESHRE Guideline

Ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Scope & assumptions

Guidance separates ovarian response assessment from reproductive outcomes. AMH/AFC should not be converted into oocyte-quality scores. No response equation or live-birth probability is inferred from guidance in this application.

View reference

AMH conversion uses 1 ng/mL ≈ 7.14 pmol/L. This is a unit conversion, not assay harmonisation or an outcome prediction.

A private consultation workspace

No names, identifiers, accounts or patient records. Inputs are held in memory only. There is no database, local storage, analytics or input submission to a server. This prototype supports discussion; it is not a validated medical device or a substitute for clinical judgment.